Chapter ten discussed the
different challenges that students may be faced with when learning to write. I
found the areas of difficulty and recommendations helpful. I couldn’t help but
tie these areas of difficulty to students I’ve taught and/or are currently
teaching. The tables were helpful because they almost act as how to
instructions to help these struggling students. I especially liked the idea of
using a Popsicle stick with a smiley face to be placed after words to help
younger students with spacing. I think one key idea in this chapter was that
all teachers are responsible for teaching all students. This chapter did a
great job of providing teachers with ideas and strategies to add to our
teaching toolbox. I also saw the connections between reading, speaking, and writing.
For example if a student is struggling with expressive knowledge, and doesn’t
say the word or sentences correctly this will also show up as errors in their
writing as well. The biggest takeaway for me in regards to ELL students who may
struggle with writing, is the idea that teachers don’t necessarily need to know
how to speak that child’s language, but they definitely need to be aware of its
structure and the similarities or differences it has with English. I was
surprised that there aren’t a whole lot of writing screening tools for pre k to
second grade students. Therefore, it is up to the teachers to create ways to
assess students. Once students have been identified as needing help with
writing the teacher cause use the RTI system as a means for successful
intervention implementation.
Since the chapter
mentioned that teachers do not have access to a wide set of screening tools to
assess writing and must use informal procedures, what are some ways that you
have been successful in doing this with your younger students?
This chapter mentioned
how students who struggle with handwriting can be given access to modifications
such an Alpha Smart or use dictation. I have had a handful of students who have
had access to these tools to use at their discretion in the regular classroom.
I struggle sometimes with these modifications though because sometimes I think
the majority of these students handwriting could improve if they were just
asked to practice more. Especially when I can see with time how their
handwriting has improved which is even more frustrating. At the same time, I am
also a big believer in the idea of “getting to the answer however you can”.
Meaning that we all have different ways of expressing or showing our learning.
Sometimes I think people are too quick to suggest modifications and ignore
looking at whether or not the student has had sufficient instruction and time. What are your thoughts about these modifications?
Jamie,
ReplyDeleteYour thoughts on modifications are very similar to mine. Since all of my students are on IEP's, many of them have additional accommodations, with handwriting being a very common modification area that I see. I also struggle with the idea of putting accommodations on a students IEP when they are showing improvement or when there are other mitigating factors (behaviors, ADHD, etc) that are impeding their handwriting abilities. However, I am definitely an advocate of using assitive technology when needed! AT is an amazing thing for sure. As an outside observer, it seem as if handwriting is generally disliked and is a struggle for nearly all students. I know this is probably a great exaggeration but with the students I am exposed to, I know it is a very common concern. This makes me even more excited to learn about assessments and strategies to help these students.
Jamie,
ReplyDeleteI think for some students, writing legibly will always be a struggle. I also think that once students move beyond certain grades, handwriting alone is not practiced but tied to other forms of communication (spelling tests, writing assignments, journals etc). So, now a student must not only focus on the act of writing but also focus on conveying meaning behind what he or she writes. All of my student receive OT services and there is usually a visual-spatial issue which impedes their ability to write legibly. Although the chapter didn't reference any specific handwriting program, but "specialized handwriting curricula"--we use Handwriting Without Tears and have had good results. I know the book reference Alpha Smart but I think those are somewhat outdated--my personal opinion.
Jamie,
DeleteI agree with the author who states, "It may be important to include some motivational or behavior support to reinforce changes in handwriting that could be difficult for students to make. I wonder how much improvement would come from student's discovering purposes of writing to meet their needs.
Jamie,
ReplyDeleteI am right there with you with using assistive technology as a modification. I too have students that struggle with handwriting that just need to practice practice practice. However it does hinder their academia due to the time it takes for them to write and frustration that comes along with the strokes. What I've been doing is providing these students with explicit instruction on how to write the alphabet letters and numbers during my time of implementing interventions. I have been using dark markers to trace the lines on papers and that really helps!
It's hard to find a balance between the too, but I do find myself allowing these students to access this modification when necessary. This may be when I am assessing their performances to better my instruction.
I love your idea about using the time for them to practice as part of your intervention time, but still allowing students to use the technology when they need it. It is tricky to find that balance for sure. I think the way you are using your intervention time is exactly what the author was suggesting we to do to incorporate writing into the RTI system. I do not know what I would do without my guided reading and writing small group times!
Deletenice beginning to your discussion. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteAn additional strategy to help increase writing on page 175 that has been found to be effective is feedback from peers, other adults, and the teacher. My experiences with feedback have been effective as a teacher and as a student.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI too love to use student feedback from peers and the teacher. My favorite strategy is simply just letting the other kids hear ideas that their peers have written. The students can then add their peer's ideas to their writing toolbox. We do a lot of informal assessments in my class where the students give positives and improvements for their peers when we are editing. The students seem to really like the positive and constructive feedback. The comment that you referred to on page 175, reminded me of one of my little boys who was an ELL studnet. The author mentioned that the strategy of feedback is esppecially helpful for ELLs. Last year, we would do sort of like a fishbowl activity where the students would read to a partner and each time they would help one another improve thier writing. With each new partner, my ELL student's confidence really grew and he became more proud of his work from his partner. By the time, he had multiple partners provide him with feedback he was ready to read aloud to the whole class!
ReplyDelete