C
& R chapter 11
In this chapter, the authors
highlight some the challenges that teachers might experience when teaching
writing. One of the number one challenges faced by teachers is having students
who refuse to write because it is too hard or boring. In order to help solve this issue, the author
makes the following recommendations. Before students value writing, they have
to see the importance that it plays in their own lives. The teacher can provide
the students with authentic opportunities to write such as writing letters,
opinions on real life issues that are important to them, or completing tasks
through writing. Another way to engage writers is provide them with choices in
what they write about it. For example, instead of providing students with one
prompt from which to write, the teacher can allow the students to choose from
multiple prompts. The authors also suggest providing choices for students when
they can complete spelling or handwriting pages. Teachers can also keep a file
of students writing, so that they can visually see their growth over time as a
writer. A second challenge for teachers has to do with having limited writing
resources. The authors answer to this question is use the resources provided in
this book as well as online. The third
challenge that teachers may experience when it comes to writing is finding time
to teach it. I agree with the authors in that writing instruction is very
important and should not be neglected, because there is a lack of time. One way
teachers can fit writing into their schedules is to integrate writing within
other subjects throughout the school day. Teachers can also incorporate writing
time into literacy center activities. A fourth challenge mentioned is trying to
meet the needs of all the diverse writers in your classroom. The authors
explain how small groups can help to differentiate writing instruction.
However, I do agree with the authors when they explained that even in small
group settings it is still hard to meet every student’s individual needs.
Therefore, sometimes the teacher needs to make time to conference one on one with
students as well. This can be done during literacy centers, or while other students
are writing or illustrating their pieces. While explicit teacher instruction is
needed by all students, the teacher can also teach students to help each other.
Sometimes talking about writing with others can help writers to get new ideas.
Classmates can also help each other with spelling words. The authors suggest
spending an hour a day with writing where part of the time is spent for whole
class instruction and the rest of the time is spent with small groups. However,
some days teachers may want their students to work on a piece for an hour of
uninterrupted time.
In my own classroom, I vary the
lengths of times that students write for. Sometimes we do quick jots, but other
times we sit and write for an extended amount of time. I do think I need to be
more mindful and make sure that my students are writing more everyday though. How closely does your class schedule for
writing each day reflect the schedule on page 189?
In your experiences as teachers,
do you have any other strategies to help with any of the four challenges
mentioned in this chapter?
Prior to reading this book, what
are some ways you have overcome the lack of resources available to you in helping
you effectively teach writing?
How did you think this chapter
was related to the new literacies articles? In my opinion, the first idea that
popped into my head was how these new literacies may help to engage some of our
writers who complain that traditional writing is boring and/or too hard.
Free Play or
Tight Spaces? Mapping Participatory Literacies in Apps Article
This
article forces the reader to take a moment and look at the apps that students
are using and how effective they are at developing literacy practices that
allow children to participate in digital cultures. One phrase mentioned in this article that I
hadn’t heard before was “app gap”. Although there has been a rise in technology
usage and purchases this is not true for all people. Research from a study showed
that only 35% percent of lower income families downloaded apps. On the other
hand, 75% of upper income families reported downloading apps. Those numbers are
strikingly different, and contribute to the app gap. The author stated that
some children may not even know what an app is. As teachers, we will have to
work to close the app gap. I think districts will need to provide teachers with
professional development opportunities to explore these apps and see how they
could be used in the classroom. The author suggests using a rubric that considers six dimensions of participatory literacies
to compare apps in regards to how learners actually use them. The six areas
are: multiplayer, productive, multimodal, open-ended, pleasurable, and
connected. I liked that the author took an ideological approach to designing
the rubric. The researchers saw literacy as taking place beyond the walls of
the school, so that it also factors in their backgrounds and cultures of
learners while also involving communicative systems. When selecting apps for students, the authors
seemed to favor apps that also mimic what teaching looks like in the classroom.
The authors suggests picking apps that allow students much creativity with production
of content, are multimodal and multisensory, have open-ended possibilities, and
allow children to collaborate and share across networks. All of those ideas
seem to go along with current teaching styles. In that we try to provide students
with opportunities to learn that are similar to what they will experience in
the real world work force. It seems as
if the author is trying to say that we need to view literacy learning from apps
in this same way, in that the apps isn’t just scratching the surface that it
really requires the students to delve deep into whatever it is they are
learning about.
After reading this
article, what apps do you feel are most beneficial for your students and which
of the six areas do they meet?
What
apps do you use that allow students to work collaboratively with one another?
If you
do not provide opportunities for students to use apps, how might you
restructure your current classroom practices to support collaboration, production,
connectivity, and other dimensions of participatory literacies?
Letting
Go of Stand Alone Technology Article
This article started off by
explaining that teachers may feel overwhelmed with the idea of technology
instruction while also having to teach all of the other curriculum, therefore
we need to find ways to integrate technology into the curriculum. One way of
doing this can be during literacy center time. At my school, students have to
use an online differentiated reading program and we do this during our center
time, because we do not have a computer lab. Integrating technology into the
curriculum during this time has been very helpful. However, after reading this
article I realized that I can do so much more than I currently do to
effectively achieve curricular integration.
In order to integrate the two,
one can use the SAMR model which is four levels of technology integration:
substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition. The substitution
level simply means that the task at hand isn’t changed but the tool used to
complete the task is changed. The example given in the article is reading on a
tablet versus print. I also think you could say that writing with pencil/paper
versus typing what you would write would also be an example. Augmentation is
the next level, in which technology is used as a tool, but also changes the
function of the task a bit. The previous two levels are referred to as
enhancements because they enhance the curriculum. Whereas the next two levels
are called “transformations” in the sense that technology is integrated with
the curriculum. The third level is the modification level in which the task is
redesigned and extended to incorporate the student’s use of technology. The
last level is redefinition, in which there is a completely new task all
together using the technology to do so.
In order to reach the fourth level, teachers need to provide young students
with opportunities at the lower enhancement levels to build up to the
transformation levels. When thinking about integrating technology into the
curriculum the author made an important point explaining that teachers need to
be sure and explicitly teach students the content and how to use the
technology. I liked the sequence that
the author suggested of explicitly teaching the literacy content first, and
then using the apps for guided and independent practice.
There are so many great ideas listed this article that I can’t wait to try out in my own class! I especially love the QR idea of letting students type their book reviews and then printing and taping them inside the books using QR Crafter the QR Stuff web-site. The notability app is also interesting, but I have never used it. I will admit that while I love all of the ideas it is a bit overwhelming especially the audio and video components. I definitely will need to familiarize myself with these tools more, because I really do think they will allow for deeper student learning and engagement
I also really liked how the
author mentioned using wiki spaces to have students publish writing, and
explained how students could give tips and comment on peer’s writings. I have
never done this, has anyone allowed their students to use this app?
Has anyone used any of the center
activities mentioned in their own classroom that help students reach the
transformation levels? If not, which activities are you most excited about
trying out in your own classrooms?
E-Books and
E-Book Apps: Considerations for Beginning Readers
This article was very
interesting. I had never thought to consider the features of ebooks and how
they might help or hinder emergent and early readers. I also was unaware that
there were so many apps available from which students can read ebooks. When
using these books in the classroom or for guided reading, it is important for
the teacher to consider the levels at which the student is reading at and
closely match the reader and text. Some E books are leveled, but if you are
using the free app Unite for Literacy, the books are organized by topic versus
level. Understanding the characteristics
of certain levels and of readers in the emergent and early reading phases will
help a teacher to know which books are appropriate. The teacher also needs to
be aware of the features in the book and explain to the students how these
features work and decide whether those features are helpful or not. As I was reading this, I couldn’t help but
think of how these eBooks would help my struggling third grade readers that
read at first grade levels. I especially liked the feature that allows the
students to read with or without narration. This feature would help to
differentiate activities at reading centers. For example, if students were struggling
to reading and asked to complete a book review at a center, being able to hear
the book would enable them to do this more effectively. Another helpful feature
that some of the ebooks offer is a tool that allows the readers to record
themselves and send this to the teacher. The author also suggested peers
listening to each other and providing feedback on fluency and expression. I
also really liked that Unite for Literacy offers the books to be read in
various languages, as this would be very helpful for ELL students. When the students choose this feature, they
have a narration button for their native language as well as English so they
can go back and forth if they’d like. When looking around on this site, I
noticed that the books could be read in many languages, however not all books
are available. The written language will only match the language for Spanish and
English narrations.
Does
your district use any of the following eBook programs mentioned in the article
(Who Can Read? Raz-Kids, (Learning A-Z), PMe Collection, Unite for Literacy)?
What have your experiences with these texts been like?
How do you incorporate eBooks in your own classroom?